Consult Us
Patient Guide · Prostate Cancer Screening

What does a raised PSA actually mean?

A clinically grounded guide to PSA test results — the age-adjusted normal ranges, the common benign causes of elevation, the diagnostic pathway after a raised result, and when nuclear medicine imaging enters the picture.

Last reviewed by Dr. Dharmender Malik on 13 May 2026 · this article reflects the published evidence and current clinical practice at FMRI Gurugram.

Introduction

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test is the most widely used tool for prostate cancer screening worldwide. It is also the most widely misunderstood. A raised PSA result is not a cancer diagnosis — it is a signal that warrants further evaluation. In the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, only about 25 percent of men with PSA values between 4 and 10 ng/mL had cancer on biopsy[4], meaning the majority of raised PSAs reflect benign conditions. This guide walks through what PSA is, what a "raised" value actually means in your age group, why PSA can be elevated for entirely non-cancerous reasons, what diagnostic pathway follows a raised result, and where prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT imaging fits into the picture.

What PSA actually is

AI Overview · plain-language definition

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a glycoprotein produced almost exclusively by prostate epithelial cells. Small amounts leak into the bloodstream normally. Higher blood levels can reflect prostate cancer — but more often reflect benign conditions such as enlargement, inflammation, or recent prostate stimulation.

PSA is a 33-kilodalton glycoprotein of the kallikrein gene family (KLK3), functioning as a serine protease that liquefies seminal coagulum after ejaculation[1]. It was isolated from human seminal plasma by Hara in 1971 and from serum by Wang and colleagues in 1979[1]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved serum PSA in 1986 for monitoring known prostate cancer, and in 1994 for screening in combination with digital rectal examination (DRE)[2].

Although produced in small quantities by some non-prostatic tissues (notably periurethral and perianal glands), PSA is functionally prostate-specific in clinically relevant concentrations. Anything that disrupts the architecture of the prostate — cancer, but also benign enlargement, inflammation, infection, or mechanical disturbance — increases PSA leakage into the bloodstream. PSA is therefore a marker of prostatic activity, not specifically of prostate cancer[3].

What counts as a "raised" PSA — age-adjusted reference ranges

AI Overview · short answer

What is a dangerous PSA level? There is no single dangerous threshold — the rate of change matters more than the absolute number. As a guide: at PSA 4-10 ng/mL the cancer detection rate on biopsy is about 25 percent; at PSA above 10 ng/mL it rises to about 50 percent; PSA above 20 ng/mL is more often associated with advanced disease[3][26]. Importantly, 15 percent of men with PSA below 4 ng/mL still have biopsy-detectable cancer[4], so "below 4" is not a guarantee.

The traditional cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL was established by Catalona and colleagues in 1991[3]. Below this value, biopsy was considered unwarranted; above it, biopsy was generally recommended. This single threshold has well-documented limitations: in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, 15.2 percent of men with PSA ≤ 4.0 ng/mL still had biopsy-detectable cancer, including 14.9 percent who had clinically significant disease (Gleason ≥ 7)[4].

Because the prostate enlarges naturally with age, fixed thresholds over-investigate older men and under-investigate younger men. Oesterling and colleagues established the age-specific reference ranges still widely used today[5]:

Age range Upper-limit PSA (ng/mL) Source
40-49 years 2.5 Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993[5]
50-59 years 3.5 Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993[5]
60-69 years 4.5 Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993[5]
70-79 years 6.5 Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993[5]

The American Urological Association notes that men of African descent generally have higher baseline PSA values and a higher incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer, and recommends that clinicians take ethnicity into account when interpreting results[6]. The European Association of Urology recommends a baseline PSA at age 40-45 for risk stratification in men with a family history of prostate cancer or known BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations[7].

It is important to understand that these are reference ranges, not diagnostic thresholds. A PSA above the age-adjusted upper limit does not mean cancer; it means further evaluation is appropriate.

Why PSA can be raised (and why most raised PSAs are not cancer)

Multiple benign conditions and transient factors can elevate PSA. The most common causes:

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) — the dominant non-cancer cause in men over 50. PSA correlates with total prostate volume at approximately 0.3 ng/mL per gram of prostate tissue[8]. A man with a 60 g prostate may have a baseline PSA around 4 ng/mL without any pathology.
  • Prostatitis — acute bacterial prostatitis can elevate PSA dramatically, sometimes above 50 ng/mL, and takes 4-8 weeks to normalise after appropriate antibiotic treatment[9]. Chronic prostatitis produces more modest elevations.
  • Recent ejaculation — Tchetgen and colleagues showed that ejaculation transiently elevates PSA by up to 1.0 ng/mL, with values returning to baseline by approximately 48 hours[10]. Men are typically advised to abstain for 48 hours before a PSA test.
  • Long-distance cycling — Mejak and colleagues showed in a 2013 PLOS ONE study that cycling 50 miles transiently raises PSA, with mean elevation of approximately 9.5 percent at 5 minutes post-ride[11]; most guidelines recommend avoiding strenuous cycling for 48 hours before testing.
  • Digital rectal examination (DRE) — produces clinically insignificant PSA elevation in most studies (mean change less than 0.4 ng/mL)[12]. A DRE on the same day as a planned PSA draw does not invalidate the test.
  • Prostate biopsy — produces large transient elevation; PSA can take 4-6 weeks to return to baseline and should not be repeated within that window[13].
  • Urinary tract infection — can elevate PSA; the test should be deferred until the infection has resolved[9].
  • 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) — these BPH medications halve PSA values within approximately 6 months of starting therapy. Men on these drugs require the measured PSA to be doubled for accurate interpretation[14].
Clinical note

If you have a raised PSA result and recently ejaculated, cycled long-distance, had a urinary infection, had a prostate biopsy in the last six weeks, or started or stopped finasteride or dutasteride within the last six months — discuss these factors with your urologist before assuming further investigation is required. A repeat PSA after these factors are controlled is the appropriate first step.

What if my PSA is rising over time? — PSA velocity and doubling time

A single raised PSA reading is one data point. The pattern of PSA change over time — its velocity and doubling time — gives a much richer signal than any single value.

PSA velocity is the rate of PSA rise, typically expressed in ng/mL per year. Carter and colleagues established the foundational threshold in a 1992 JAMA paper: a PSA velocity greater than 0.75 ng/mL per year in men with baseline PSA below 4 raised concern for cancer, with specificity of 90 percent[17]. Subsequent analyses have refined this — Carter et al. (J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006) suggested even lower thresholds (>0.35 ng/mL/year) may be clinically meaningful in younger men with low baseline PSA[27]. Modern guidelines treat PSA velocity as an adjunct to other metrics rather than a standalone trigger, because day-to-day biological variation can produce misleadingly high velocity if too few measurements are used. Most clinicians require at least three PSA values over 18-24 months before placing weight on velocity.

PSA doubling time is the time taken for PSA to double, typically reported in months. It is most clinically informative after a cancer diagnosis — specifically in biochemical recurrence following primary treatment. Pound and colleagues (JAMA, 1999) demonstrated that PSA doubling time after radical prostatectomy is one of the strongest predictors of distant metastasis: doubling time below 10 months is associated with substantially higher risk of metastasis and prostate-cancer-specific mortality, while doubling time above 15 months is associated with much slower-progressing disease[28]. In an untreated raised-PSA context (no confirmed cancer), doubling time is less directly clinically useful than velocity but is sometimes calculated for surveillance.

A note on calculation

Calculating velocity or doubling time from two PSA values 4-6 weeks apart is unreliable. Both metrics need at least three values over an extended interval — typically 18-24 months — to produce trustworthy numbers. If your urologist is monitoring you with serial PSA, this is exactly the pattern they are looking for.

What happens next — the diagnostic pathway

A raised PSA on a single test is not enough to trigger biopsy. The contemporary diagnostic pathway, supported by current European Association of Urology and American Urological Association guidelines, is structured as follows[6][7]:

Step 1: Confirm with a repeat PSA. A repeat PSA at 4-8 weeks (after controlling for transient causes — abstaining from ejaculation for 48 hours, no recent UTI, no recent prostate manipulation) rules out laboratory variation and transient elevations[6].

Step 2: Adjunct PSA-based metrics. Three derived metrics improve specificity:

  • Free-to-total PSA ratio — most PSA in blood is bound to alpha-1-antichymotrypsin; cancer cells produce relatively more bound PSA. A free PSA ratio below 25 percent raises concern; below 10 percent is strongly suggestive of cancer (Catalona 1998)[15].
  • PSA density — PSA divided by prostate volume (from transrectal ultrasound or MRI). A density above 0.15 ng/mL/cc increases the likelihood of clinically significant cancer[16].
  • PSA velocity — as described in the section above; a velocity above 0.75 ng/mL/year in men with baseline PSA below 4 raises concern[17].

Step 3: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate. The PROMIS study (Ahmed et al., Lancet 2017) demonstrated that multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before biopsy has higher sensitivity (93 percent) than standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (48 percent) for clinically significant cancer[18]. The PRECISION trial (Kasivisvanathan et al., NEJM 2018) confirmed that an MRI-first pathway detects more clinically significant cancers (38 percent vs 26 percent) while reducing detection of clinically insignificant disease (9 percent vs 22 percent) and avoiding biopsy in 28 percent of men[19]. mpMRI before biopsy is now the contemporary standard.

Step 4: PI-RADS scoring and targeted biopsy. Lesions identified on mpMRI are scored using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1[20]. PI-RADS 3-5 lesions trigger targeted biopsy (typically MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy or in-bore MRI-guided biopsy).

Step 5: Additional molecular adjuncts where appropriate. In selected cases, urine-based or blood-based molecular tests can refine biopsy decisions — including the 4Kscore, SelectMDx, ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore, and MyProstateScore[21]. These are typically used when initial workup is equivocal.

"In my referral practice at FMRI, the most common pattern is a man who has had one raised PSA reading and is referred for a PSMA PET-CT before any other step. The right next step is almost always a repeat PSA under controlled conditions, then multiparametric MRI if elevation is confirmed. PSMA PET-CT is a staging tool, not a triage tool for a raised PSA."

Dr. Ishita B. Sen, MD · Director & Chief, Nuclear Medicine, FMRI

Specialist second opinion

If your urologist has discussed PSMA PET-CT and you want a nuclear medicine second-opinion read of your PSA pathway — or to understand whether PSMA PET-CT is the right scan for your specific situation — FMRI's nuclear medicine team can review your case.

Discuss your PSA pathway · WhatsApp +91 8800 988936

When PSMA PET-CT enters the picture

PSMA PET-CT is a powerful nuclear medicine imaging modality that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen — a protein highly expressed on prostate cancer cells. The U.S. FDA approved Gallium-68 PSMA-11 in December 2020 and Fluorine-18 piflufolastat (Pylarify) in May 2021 for clinical use[22]. It is important to understand where this scan does — and does not — fit in the raised-PSA pathway.

PSMA PET-CT is used for:

  • Initial staging of newly diagnosed unfavourable-intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. The proPSMA trial (Hofman et al., Lancet 2020) demonstrated that PSMA PET-CT had 27 percent higher accuracy than conventional imaging — 92 percent versus 65 percent — for detecting metastatic disease[23]. PSMA PET-CT changed management in 28 percent of patients in the trial.
  • Biochemical recurrence — rising PSA after definitive primary treatment. PSMA PET-CT detects sites of recurrence at substantially lower PSA values than older imaging[24].
  • Treatment-eligibility assessment — particularly for Lu-177 PSMA radioligand therapy in advanced disease[25].

PSMA PET-CT is not used for:

  • The initial workup of a raised PSA in a man without confirmed prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is the appropriate first-line imaging in this context[6][7].

If you have been told you have a raised PSA but have not yet had a biopsy or formal cancer diagnosis, your next imaging study should be a multiparametric MRI of the prostate, not a PSMA PET-CT. For a broader picture of prostate cancer staging, treatment by stage, and where nuclear medicine fits, see our pillar guide: An in-depth look at prostate cancer.

Can you lower a raised PSA? What actually works (and what does not)

The honest answer to "can I lower my PSA?" is: it depends entirely on why the PSA is raised. Lowering a PSA that is raised because of a treatable benign condition is reasonable and useful. Lowering a PSA that is raised because of cancer, without addressing the cancer, is harmful — because it masks the underlying disease and can delay diagnosis.

Interventions with evidence — and how they actually work:

  • 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) halve PSA values within approximately 6 months of starting therapy (Etzioni et al., J Urol 2005)[14]. These drugs are commonly used for BPH and male-pattern hair loss. Crucially: they do not "treat" a raised PSA — they suppress it. Men on these drugs require the measured PSA to be doubled for accurate interpretation. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (Thompson et al., NEJM 2003) demonstrated that finasteride reduced overall prostate cancer incidence by 24.8 percent but with a possible association with higher-grade tumours in detected cases[29].
  • Antibiotic treatment of bacterial prostatitis can dramatically reduce a PSA elevated by infection. Nadler et al. (J Urol 1995) showed that resolving prostatic inflammation produces PSA reductions, sometimes from values above 50 ng/mL back to normal range over 4-8 weeks[9]. Empirical antibiotic trials in the absence of confirmed prostatitis are not recommended.
  • Treating a urinary tract infection allows a misleadingly elevated PSA to normalise; a PSA test should be deferred until the infection has resolved[9].
  • Allowing time after recent ejaculation, cycling, or prostate manipulation — abstain from ejaculation for 48 hours and avoid strenuous cycling for 48 hours before retesting; allow 4-6 weeks after a prostate biopsy[10][11][13].

Interventions with weak or no high-quality evidence:

  • Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) — multiple randomised trials have shown no clinically meaningful PSA reduction. The STEP trial (Bent et al., NEJM 2006) was a 14-month placebo-controlled trial of saw palmetto in men with BPH symptoms and found no significant effect on PSA, urinary symptoms, or prostate volume[30]. The CAMUS trial (Barry et al., JAMA 2011) confirmed this finding at higher doses[31].
  • Lycopene, pomegranate, green tea, selenium, vitamin E, zinc — small studies have suggested possible effects, but the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT; Klein et al., JAMA 2011) showed selenium and vitamin E did not reduce prostate cancer risk, and vitamin E was associated with a small increase in risk[32]. Pomegranate juice studies (Pantuck et al., Clin Cancer Res 2006) showed modest PSA effects in small uncontrolled trials but have not been replicated in larger randomised studies[33].
  • General diet and lifestyle changes — Mediterranean-style diet, regular exercise, weight loss, and reduced consumption of red and processed meats are associated with lower prostate cancer mortality in observational studies, but their effect on PSA values specifically is modest and not a substitute for proper diagnostic evaluation[34].
Important

The most important point is this: a raised PSA is a question, not a problem to be silenced. Lowering a raised PSA without first understanding why it is raised — particularly by taking finasteride, dutasteride, or unproven supplements — can mask cancer and delay diagnosis. The right response to a raised PSA is structured investigation, not cosmetic suppression of the number.

How to read your PSA result — a practical summary

  • A raised PSA on a single test does not mean cancer. The first step is a repeat PSA after controlling for transient factors.
  • Use the age-adjusted reference ranges, not the single 4.0 ng/mL cutoff[5].
  • If you are on finasteride or dutasteride, your measured PSA should be doubled for interpretation[14].
  • If sustained elevation is confirmed, a urology referral and multiparametric MRI are the contemporary next steps — not immediate biopsy[18][19].
  • PSMA PET-CT enters the pathway after cancer is confirmed, for staging or recurrence assessment[23].
  • Most "natural" PSA-lowering supplements have weak or no high-quality evidence. The honest approach is investigation, not suppression.
For patients & referring clinicians

Frequently asked questions

Q01 What is a normal PSA level?

There is no single universally "normal" PSA value. The traditional cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL was established by Catalona and colleagues in 1991. Most contemporary guidelines use age-adjusted reference ranges from Oesterling et al. (JAMA 1993): up to 2.5 ng/mL for men 40-49, 3.5 for 50-59, 4.5 for 60-69, and 6.5 for 70-79 years. The American Urological Association notes higher baseline values in men of African descent. A PSA "above normal" warrants evaluation, not panic.

Q02 What PSA level is dangerous?

There is no single dangerous threshold; the rate of change and clinical context matter more than absolute value. As a guide: at PSA 4-10 ng/mL, the cancer detection rate on biopsy is approximately 25 percent; at PSA above 10 ng/mL, it rises to approximately 50 percent; and PSA above 20 ng/mL is more often associated with advanced or metastatic disease. Importantly, in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, 15.2 percent of men with PSA at or below 4.0 ng/mL also had biopsy-detectable cancer — so "below 4" is not a guarantee of cancer absence.

Q03 What is a normal PSA level for a 60-year-old?

For men aged 60-69, the widely used age-adjusted upper limit is 4.5 ng/mL (Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993). A value at or below 4.5 ng/mL is within the reference range for this age group; values above 4.5 warrant clinical evaluation. Note that this is a population-level reference range and individual variation occurs — your urologist will interpret your number in the context of your prostate volume, prior PSA history, family history, and clinical findings.

Q04 Does a raised PSA always mean cancer?

No. The majority of raised PSA results reflect benign conditions. In the PSA 4-10 ng/mL range, only about 25 percent of men have cancer on biopsy. The most common non-cancer causes are benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, and recent prostate manipulation. A structured diagnostic pathway — repeat PSA, adjunct metrics, multiparametric MRI — separates true cancer signal from benign elevation.

Q05 Can benign prostate enlargement (BPH) cause raised PSA?

Yes. BPH is the most common cause of elevated PSA in men over 50. PSA correlates with prostate volume at approximately 0.3 ng/mL per gram of tissue. A man with a 60 g prostate (about twice the average adult size) can have a baseline PSA close to 4 ng/mL without any cancer present.

Q06 Does ejaculation or cycling affect PSA results?

Yes — both can transiently raise PSA. Tchetgen et al. (Urology 1996) showed ejaculation can elevate PSA by up to 1.0 ng/mL, returning to baseline by approximately 48 hours. Mejak et al. (PLOS ONE 2013) showed long-distance cycling can produce modest transient elevation. Most laboratories recommend abstaining from ejaculation for 48 hours and avoiding strenuous cycling for 48 hours before a PSA test.

Q07 What is the PSA range by age?

The widely used age-adjusted reference ranges (Oesterling et al., JAMA 1993) are: 40-49 years up to 2.5 ng/mL; 50-59 years up to 3.5 ng/mL; 60-69 years up to 4.5 ng/mL; 70-79 years up to 6.5 ng/mL. These are reference ranges, not absolute cutoffs — a result above the range warrants evaluation, not immediate biopsy.

Q08 What is PSA velocity and what is PSA doubling time?

PSA velocity is the rate of PSA rise per year, typically requiring at least three PSA values over 18-24 months to calculate reliably. Carter et al. (JAMA 1992) established a threshold of 0.75 ng/mL/year as concerning, though subsequent work has refined this for younger men with low baseline PSA. PSA doubling time is the time for PSA to double, most clinically useful in biochemical recurrence after primary treatment — Pound et al. (JAMA 1999) showed doubling time below 10 months is associated with substantially higher risk of metastasis. Both metrics are adjuncts to other diagnostic tools, not standalone triggers.

Q09 Can I take finasteride if I have a raised PSA?

Finasteride and dutasteride are reasonable medications for BPH or male-pattern hair loss, but they will halve your measured PSA over approximately six months (Etzioni et al., J Urol 2005). This does not "treat" the underlying cause of raised PSA — it masks it. If you are considering finasteride or dutasteride and have a raised PSA, the appropriate sequence is: investigate the raised PSA first (repeat PSA, mpMRI if indicated, urology consultation), then make the medication decision with full information. If you are already on these medications, your urologist will double your measured PSA for interpretation.

Q10 Can I lower my PSA naturally?

Honestly: it depends on why the PSA is raised. Treatable benign causes can be addressed — antibiotics for prostatitis, allowing time after recent ejaculation or cycling, or treating a urinary tract infection. But "natural" supplements widely marketed for lowering PSA — saw palmetto, lycopene, pomegranate, green tea, selenium — have weak or no high-quality evidence for clinically meaningful PSA reduction. The STEP trial (NEJM 2006) and CAMUS trial (JAMA 2011) both showed saw palmetto produced no significant PSA reduction. SELECT (JAMA 2011) showed selenium and vitamin E did not reduce prostate cancer risk. The right response to a raised PSA is structured investigation, not cosmetic suppression of the number.

Q11 How should I prepare for a PSA test?

Standard preparation: abstain from ejaculation for 48 hours; avoid strenuous cycling for 48 hours; defer the test if you have an active urinary tract infection; wait 4-6 weeks after any prostate biopsy or transurethral procedure. A digital rectal examination on the same day does not invalidate the result. If you are on finasteride or dutasteride for BPH or hair loss, inform your doctor — your measured PSA must be doubled for accurate interpretation. The blood draw itself requires no fasting and no other preparation.

Q12 What tests follow a raised PSA result?

The contemporary pathway, supported by EAU and AUA guidelines, is: (1) repeat PSA at 4-8 weeks after controlling for transient causes; (2) adjunct metrics — free-to-total PSA ratio, PSA density, PSA velocity; (3) multiparametric MRI of the prostate before any biopsy decision, supported by the PROMIS and PRECISION trials; (4) targeted biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions; (5) selected molecular adjuncts (4Kscore, SelectMDx, ExoDx) where the picture is equivocal. PSMA PET-CT is used after cancer is confirmed, not for initial workup of a raised PSA.

Citations & references

Balk SP, Ko YJ, Bubley GJ. Biology of prostate-specific antigen. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(2):383-91. Reference
U.S. FDA. Approval history of serum PSA for prostate cancer screening (1986, 1994). FDA archive. Reference
Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(17):1156-61. Reference
Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level ≤ 4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2239-46. Reference
Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA. 1993;270(7):860-4. Reference
Wei JT, Barocas D, Carlsson S, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2023. Reference
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology. Reference
Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(15):909-16. Reference
Nadler RB, Humphrey PA, Smith DS, et al. Effect of inflammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia on elevated serum prostate-specific antigen levels. J Urol. 1995;154(2 Pt 1):407-13. Reference
Tchetgen MB, Song JT, Strawderman M, Jacobsen SJ, Oesterling JE. Ejaculation increases the serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Urology. 1996;47(4):511-6. Reference
Mejak SL, Bayliss J, Hanks SD. Long distance bicycle riding causes prostate-specific antigen to increase in men aged 50 years and over. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56030. Reference
Crawford ED, Schutz MJ, Clejan S, et al. The effect of digital rectal examination on prostate-specific antigen levels. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2227-8. Reference
Yuan JJ, Coplen DE, Petros JA, et al. Effects of rectal examination, prostatic massage, ultrasonography and needle biopsy on serum prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol. 1992;147(3 Pt 2):810-4. Reference
Etzioni RD, Howlader N, Shaw PA, et al. Long-term effects of finasteride on prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol. 2005;174(3):877-81. Reference
Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1542-7. Reference
Nordström T, Akre O, Aly M, et al. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21(1):57-63. Reference
Carter HB, Pearson JD, Metter EJ, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2215-20. Reference
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS). Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815-22. Reference
Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis (PRECISION). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767-77. Reference
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 update of PI-RADS Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340-51. Reference
Parekh DJ, Punnen S, Sjoberg DD, et al. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):464-70. Reference
U.S. FDA. Approval letters for Ga-68 PSMA-11 (Dec 2020) and F-18 piflufolastat / Pylarify (May 2021). Reference
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA). Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208-16. Reference
Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856-63. Reference
Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (VISION). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091-103. Reference
Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2027-35. Reference
Carter HB, Ferrucci L, Kettermann A, et al. Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(21):1521-27. Reference
Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1591-7. Reference
Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer (PCPT). N Engl J Med. 2003;349(3):215-24. Reference
Bent S, Kane C, Shinohara K, et al. Saw palmetto for benign prostatic hyperplasia (STEP). N Engl J Med. 2006;354(6):557-66. Reference
Barry MJ, Meleth S, Lee JY, et al. Effect of increasing doses of saw palmetto extract on lower urinary tract symptoms (CAMUS). JAMA. 2011;306(12):1344-51. Reference
Klein EA, Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, et al. Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer (SELECT). JAMA. 2011;306(14):1549-56. Reference
Pantuck AJ, Leppert JT, Zomorodian N, et al. Phase II study of pomegranate juice for men with rising PSA following surgery or radiation for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(13):4018-26. Reference
Kenfield SA, DuPre N, Richman EL, et al. Mediterranean diet and prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):887-94. Reference
Dr. Ishita B. Sen
About the Author

Dr. Ishita B. Sen

MBBS · MD (Nuclear Medicine) · DNB · Post-doctoral Fellowship, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

Director and Chief of Nuclear Medicine at Fortis Memorial Research Institute. Co-founder of Theranostic Physicians Private Limited (TPPL). Two decades of clinical practice in PSMA imaging and PSMA-directed radioligand therapy, with one of the largest Indian institutional experiences in Lu-PSMA.

Subscribe

Clinical commentary, monthly.

One email a month with new writing from Dr. Sen and the TPPL team — clinical frameworks, literature reviews, the occasional essay. No marketing.

Medical disclaimer All physicians and researchers profiled on this page hold appointments at the Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram. Theranostic Physicians Private Limited (TPPL) is the clinical practice entity through which they consult and treat patients. Treatment outcomes vary by individual case; clinical decisions are made on the basis of complete medical records, current imaging, and a multidisciplinary review.